https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118950

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
  _304 = _113 != 0;
  _373 = _113 == 0;
  _305 = _132 != 0;
  _377 = _132 == 0;
  _597 = (<signed-boolean:1>) _377;
  _598 = [vec_duplicate_expr] _597;
  _599 = _359 + 20;
  _602 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<unsigned char>(_305);
  _603 = [vec_duplicate_expr] _602;
  _606 = (<signed-boolean:1>) _373;
  _607 = [vec_duplicate_expr] _606;


This seems odd. That is the _602 combined with _603 seems odd.

Reply via email to