https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118920

--- Comment #2 from Frank B. Brokken <f.b.brokken at rug dot nl> ---
Dear pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org, you wrote:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118920
> 
> Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>            See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
>                    |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=104433
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Can you try -fno-checking. I suspect this might be just a checking ICE which
> might not show up with release checking.

Interesting! If I specify -fno-checking no error is reported. So your
suggestion works. Certainly something for me to keep in mind. Do you think
that -fno-checking is only temporary needed or do you advise to use it when
errors like the 'canonical types differ...' error are reported by the
compiler? 

Thanks for your feedback :-)

Cheers,

Reply via email to