https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118854

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The bug is in your code. 

> If I reverse the order of these two statements

That is correct. You have an order of initialization issue. 

BackgroundThread constructor uses Resource:: _pInstance indirectly via the
thread.

Reply via email to