https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118843
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> I tried to make some changes, and the test went smoothly without any issues.
> for (int i = 0; i < N_EVO_FEATURES; i++)
> {
> builtin_undef (la_evo_macro_name[i]);
>
> if (la_target.isa.evolution & la_evo_feature_masks[i]
> && (la_evo_feature_masks[i] ^ OPTION_MASK_ISA_FRECIPE
I suppose "!=" would be more readable than "^".
> || TARGET_HARD_FLOAT))
> {
> builtin_define (la_evo_macro_name[i]);
>
> int major = la_evo_version_major[i],
> minor = la_evo_version_minor[i];
>
> max_v_major = major > max_v_major ? major : max_v_major;
> max_v_minor = major == max_v_major
> ? (minor > max_v_minor ? minor : max_v_minor) : max_v_minor;
> }
> }
