https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118574
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20) > Note, even just > But in the range-for case, the lifetime of those temporaries doesn't end at > the end of the statement but is until the end of the range for body. .. failing to handle this could be the bug (although I'm not sure what exactly changed to regress it).
