https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115265
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Matthew Krupcale from comment #3) > Hey Paul, > > Great, thanks for adding this testcase. Is there any change the fix in > PR109066 will be applied to older branches, e.g. 13 and 14? > > Matthew Sorry for the slow response - I have just spent a week chilling out (literally and spritually!) in Cornwall. My inclination is to say that it shouldn't be backported, partly because neither PR is a regression and partly because the treatment of component defined assignment is just plain wrong and I am reluctant to patch it up further. That said, I will put the question to the list. Regards Paul
