https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118710
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Koehler <rtkoehle at mtu dot edu> ---
Hey, I lied. I think the patch introduced a new compiler bug. When I pulled and
patched gcc (15.0.1 experimental) I ran into the bug that I mentioned in my
previous comment.
here is the error message:
pier_quant.f90:36:29:
36 | end subroutine set_vals_C
| 1
internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or
qual_union_type, have array_type in gfc_class_data_get, at
fortran/trans-expr.cc:248
0x263dd82 internal_error(char const*, ...)
../../gcc/gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:517
0x895de3 tree_check_failed(tree_node const*, char const*, int, char const*,
...)
../../gcc/gcc/tree.cc:9045
0x759e58 tree_check3(tree_node*, char const*, int, char const*, tree_code,
tree_code, tree_code)
../../gcc/gcc/tree.h:3727
0x759e58 gfc_class_data_get(tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:248
0xaeab68 gfc_trans_deferred_vars(gfc_symbol*, gfc_wrapped_block*)
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc:4943
0xaed508 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*)
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc:8166
0xab9711 gfc_generate_module_code(gfc_namespace*)
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans.cc:2765
0xa55695 translate_all_program_units
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.cc:7362
0xa55695 gfc_parse_file()
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.cc:7692
0xab0a7f gfc_be_parse_file
../../gcc/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.cc:241
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
When I compile the code attached with gfortran version 14.2.1 I do not get any
error when compiling this code. Given that its an issue with this patch I
figgured I would report it here. I will attach the code in question.
