https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118475

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Bisecting didn't go well because of:
```
FAILED: tests/program_mixer.p/program_mixer_tests.cpp.o
/tmp/gcc/bin/g++ -Itests/program_mixer.p -Itests
-I../dosbox-staging-0.82.0/tests -I../dosbox-staging-0.82.0/include -I.
-I../dosbox-staging-0.82.0 -fdiagnostics-color=always -DNDEBUG
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Wpedantic -std=c++20
-Wno-unknown-pragmas -fpch-preprocess -Wmaybe-uninitialized -Weffc++
-Wextra-semi -shared-libgcc -fPIC -msse2 -mssse3 -DLOGURU_STACKTRACES=1
-DLOGURU_USE_LOCALE=0 -O2 -ggdb3 -DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=1
-isystem../dosbox-staging-0.82.0/src/libs -isystemsrc/libs -Walloca
-Wctor-dtor-privacy -Wdate-time -Wdisabled-optimization -Wduplicated-branches
-Weffc++ -Wextra-semi -Wlogical-op -Wlogical-not-parentheses -Wredundant-decls
-Wmismatched-tags -Wsizeof-pointer-div -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-null-sentinel
-Wsuggest-override -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant -Wno-format-security
-Wno-effc++ -MD -MQ tests/program_mixer.p/program_mixer_tests.cpp.o -MF
tests/program_mixer.p/program_mixer_tests.cpp.o.d -o
tests/program_mixer.p/program_mixer_tests.cpp.o -c
../dosbox-staging-0.82.0/tests/program_mixer_tests.cpp
../dosbox-staging-0.82.0/tests/program_mixer_tests.cpp: In function
'std::queue<std::variant<MixerCommand::SelectChannel, MixerCommand::SetVolume,
MixerCommand::SetStereoMode, MixerCommand::SetCrossfeedStrength,
MixerCommand::SetReverbLevel, MixerCommand::SetChorusLevel> >
select_channel(const std::string&)':
../dosbox-staging-0.82.0/tests/program_mixer_tests.cpp:95:1: internal compiler
error: in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.cc:8958
   95 | }
```

which was PR117980 I assume, which makes me pretty sure this is PR118396.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118396 ***

Reply via email to