https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
Romain Geissler <romain.geissler at amadeus dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
--- Comment #23 from Romain Geissler <romain.geissler at amadeus dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16)
> I missed this update, sorry.
>
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #15)
> > Jonathan, what's the next step? It sounds as though you don't think
> > decorating nearly every libstdc++ class makes sense.
>
> I'd really rather not do that, but we could start with std::basic_string.
Hi Jon,
Coming back on this old topic, one of my users did hit exactly this "issue" to
day and did contact me asking why the extra unused std::string wasn't used.
Years ago you did agree we could start with basic_string but apparently it was
never done, what is your opinion in 2025 ?
