https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118431

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |21093

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Now GCC should be able to do better at tail calls in general, see PR 21093 for
an example.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21093
[Bug 21093] missed tail call optimization when local address could escape

Reply via email to