https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118431
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |21093 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Now GCC should be able to do better at tail calls in general, see PR 21093 for an example. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21093 [Bug 21093] missed tail call optimization when local address could escape