https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118348
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > I suspect this can be reproduced before with -fno-vect-cost since that > revision is a cost model change. No it's the commit that enables the conditional store optimization for AArch64. I suspect it's a wrong mask and the mask is writing too much data. Should be easy to track down.