https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198
Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'll note that in e.g. Ada, we already have to disable sibling call
optimisation as well (gcc/ada/libgnat/s-traceb.adb) - so which is it? we expect
people to disable the optimisation when they need the behaviour, or we have to
make such optimisations non-default (as we did with H.J.'s) because of people
relying on it for backtraces?
