https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008

--- Comment #11 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #8)
> Thank you, Nathaniel!
> 
> Comparing a build from yesterday including my hack from comment #4 
>   https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-December/833400.html
> with one from today with your proper patch
>   https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-December/833487.html
> also the latter addresses this issue.

For the sake of completeness, there were a few differences in test
results - alas for two codebases 24 hours apart, so it's not just
the patch vs my hack that is different.

(Sorry, I originally pasted this in the wrong report.)


< FAIL: g++.dg/pch/line-map-2.C -fno-modules -O2 -g -I. -Dwith_PCH  (test for
errors, line 6)
< FAIL: g++.dg/pch/line-map-2.C -fno-modules -O2 -g -I. -Dwith_PCH (test for
excess errors)

> XPASS: g++.dg/pch/line-map-3.C -fno-modules -O2 -g -I. -Dwith_PCH  (test for 
> bogus messages, line 2)
> XPASS: g++.dg/pch/line-map-3.C -fno-modules -O2 -g -I. -Dwith_PCH  at line 17 
> (test for bogus messages, line 2)
> FAIL: g++.dg/pch/line-map-3.C -fno-modules -O2 -g -I. -Dwith_PCH  dg-regexp 
> 23 not found: "[^[:space:]]*: some warnings being treated as errors"
> FAIL: g++.dg/pch/line-map-3.C -fno-modules -O2 -g -I. -Dwith_PCH (test for 
> excess errors)

> FAIL: g++.dg/pch/local-1.C -O2 assembly comparison
> FAIL: g++.dg/pch/local-1.C -fno-modules -O2 -I. -Dwith_PCH (test for excess 
> errors)

< FAIL: g++.dg/pch/pr98343.C -O2 assembly comparison
< FAIL: g++.dg/pch/pr98343.C -fno-modules -O2 -I. -Dwith_PCH (test for excess
errors)

< FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -O2 assembly comparison
< FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -fno-modules -O2 -I. -Dwith_PCH (test for excess
errors)

Reply via email to