https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111814
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jiaxun Yang from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > > Note it might need to be under the check of -mieee too .... > > I'm preparing patch for this issue Thanks! > and IMO this should not be under -mieee, > but applied unconditionally to whole architecture. > > We are actually not IEEE754-2008 compliant by having reversed signalling bit > and slightly different NaN propagation rules... > > Other architectures with such feature like hppa and MIPS are all doing it > unconditionally as well, also note that unlike other -mieee features this > won't come with any performance penalty. Sounds good.
