------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-10-12 19:52 ------- You are right. The second patch isn't needed.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17311
- [Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 is us... tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 ... hjl at lucon dot org
- [Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 ... tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 ... hjl at lucon dot org
- [Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 ... tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
- hjl at lucon dot org
