https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93921
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=94960
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
My understanding is that standard promises that explicit instantiation disables
implicit one (since it may fail).
PR94960 seems to be fit for tracking bug for this problem - but I think we need
to add explicit inline to those functions which are explicitely instantiated
and makes sense to be understood by the compiler (not necessarily always
inlined).
