https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117993
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > I suspect for some reason we think the current instantiation does not have a
> > dependent base for some reason.
>
> That is any_dependent_bases_p is returning false for `struct B<T>::C<n>`
> type.
Indeed, so it seems any_dependent_bases_p should recursively consider indirect
bases.
Or for
template<class T>
struct B { template<class U> struct C; };
template<class T>
template<class U>
struct B<T>::C : B<T> { }
should BINFO_DEPENDENT_BASE_P be set on the base B<T>?
