https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117882

--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> I don't think it's a dup

This meant to say "... of PR 24663." because it's not the same problem.

Reply via email to