https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68034
--- Comment #3 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Accordingly, it's a better fit for static analysis.
sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:21:19 -0800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68034
--- Comment #3 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Accordingly, it's a better fit for static analysis.