https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56504
Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Since I didn't implement support for all of the AOCL LibM vectorized functions
I don't suppose it would make sense to close this bug. Or would it?
Maybe we should rename this bug to something like "-mveclibabi=... Support
AMD's array versions of vectorized functions". I think those are basically the
only remaining functions that are interesting. Maybe also sincos is
interesting.
