https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111861

--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #2)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > Interesting, I guess 'auto x = *iter;' should never be done in generic code
> > then?
> 
> Yap, even 'range_value_t<R> x = *iter;'.
Ah right though in these cases the indirectly_copyable_storable requirements
allow for that.

Reply via email to