https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117474

--- Comment #1 from Rimvydas (RJ) <rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com> ---
It seams there are no major memory leaks.

$ valgrind --leak-check=full /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/14/f951 -I.
test.f90
...
==118405== 1,234,200 bytes in 4,675 blocks are definitely lost in loss record
7,382 of 7,384
==118405==    at 0x484EA2F: calloc (in
/usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==118405==    by 0x1B90FFE: UnknownInlinedFun (xmalloc.c:164)
==118405==    by 0x1B90FFE: gfc_copy_array_spec(gfc_array_spec*) (array.cc:955)
==118405==    by 0x1C8F2F4: resolve_component(gfc_component*, gfc_symbol*)
(resolve.cc:15439)
==118405==    by 0x1C9036A: resolve_fl_derived0(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.cc:15849)
==118405==    by 0x1C912D6: resolve_fl_derived(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.cc:15981)
==118405==    by 0x1C8BA77: resolve_symbol(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.cc:16379)
==118405==    by 0x1CA91F2: do_traverse_symtree(gfc_symtree*, void
(*)(gfc_symtree*), void (*)(gfc_symbol*)) [clone .lto_priv.0] (symbol.cc:4338)
==118405==    by 0x1C8A531: UnknownInlinedFun (symbol.cc:4363)
==118405==    by 0x1C8A531: resolve_types(gfc_namespace*) (resolve.cc:18341)
==118405==    by 0x1C8B1C9: gfc_resolve(gfc_namespace*) [clone .part.0]
(resolve.cc:18461)
==118405==    by 0x1C8E541: resolve_symbol(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.cc:17016)
==118405==    by 0x1CA91F2: do_traverse_symtree(gfc_symtree*, void
(*)(gfc_symtree*), void (*)(gfc_symbol*)) [clone .lto_priv.0] (symbol.cc:4338)
==118405==    by 0x1C8A531: UnknownInlinedFun (symbol.cc:4363)
==118405==    by 0x1C8A531: resolve_types(gfc_namespace*) (resolve.cc:18341)
==118405==
==118405== 6,209,952 bytes in 27,723 blocks are definitely lost in loss record
7,383 of 7,384
==118405==    at 0x484EA2F: calloc (in
/usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==118405==    by 0x1BB5E8F: UnknownInlinedFun (xmalloc.c:164)
==118405==    by 0x1BB5E8F: UnknownInlinedFun (expr.cc:49)
==118405==    by 0x1BB5E8F: gfc_lval_expr_from_sym(gfc_symbol*) (expr.cc:5301)
==118405==    by 0x1BA9767: generate_finalization_wrapper(gfc_symbol*,
gfc_namespace*, char const*, gfc_component*) (class.cc:2343)
==118405==    by 0x1BA29B1: gfc_find_derived_vtab(gfc_symbol*) (class.cc:2672)
==118405==    by 0x1C79137: gfc_resolve_finalizers(gfc_symbol*, bool*)
(resolve.cc:14523)
==118405==    by 0x1C912B8: resolve_fl_derived(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.cc:15956)
==118405==    by 0x1C8BA77: resolve_symbol(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.cc:16379)
==118405==    by 0x1CA91F2: do_traverse_symtree(gfc_symtree*, void
(*)(gfc_symtree*), void (*)(gfc_symbol*)) [clone .lto_priv.0] (symbol.cc:4338)
==118405==    by 0x1C8A531: UnknownInlinedFun (symbol.cc:4363)
==118405==    by 0x1C8A531: resolve_types(gfc_namespace*) (resolve.cc:18341)
==118405==    by 0x1C8B1C9: gfc_resolve(gfc_namespace*) [clone .part.0]
(resolve.cc:18461)
==118405==    by 0x1C8E541: resolve_symbol(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.cc:17016)
==118405==    by 0x1CA91F2: do_traverse_symtree(gfc_symtree*, void
(*)(gfc_symtree*), void (*)(gfc_symbol*)) [clone .lto_priv.0] (symbol.cc:4338)
==118405==
==118405== LEAK SUMMARY:
==118405==    definitely lost: 171,216,496 bytes in 188,808 blocks
==118405==    indirectly lost: 376,294,672 bytes in 1,159,513 blocks
==118405==      possibly lost: 24,832 bytes in 59 blocks
==118405==    still reachable: 38,215,755 bytes in 22,899 blocks
==118405==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks

Reply via email to