https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117432
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=92768
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Similar to PR 92768 about 0.0 and -0.0 being treated the same too with -Ofast:
```
void bar(int tag, ...);
void foo32(void) {
bar(1, 0.0, 0);
}
void foo64(void) {
vect16 long t = {-1, -1};
bar(1, -0.0, 0);
}
```
So yes I think OEP_BITWISE needs to here too.