https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|union not written to with |[12/13/14/15 Regression] |particular layout |union not written to with | |particular layout Last reconfirmed| |2024-11-03 Component|middle-end |tree-optimization --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. Before esra: rv.DATA.var_0._1 = 2; var7 = f2 (arg0_5(D)); rv.DATA.var_0._0 = var7; D.2927 = rv; After: rv$DATA$var_0$_1_17 = 2; var7 = f2 (arg0_5(D)); rv.DATA.var_0._0 = var7; MEM <unsigned char> [(struct s2 *)&D.2927] = rv$DATA$var_0$_1_17; MEM <long int> [(struct s2 *)&D.2927 + 8B] = rv$DATA$var_1$_1_18(D); Notice var7 is not copied correctly.