https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115805

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection,
                   |                            |needs-source

--- Comment #2 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note that -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 (and also =2 to some extent) impose stricter
> constraints on the program than the C or C++ standard do.  That means valid
> C/C++ programs can become invalid so -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 isn't generally safe
> to use.  By bet would be there's cross-field stringop operations in cactus.

That said, I can only remember.. one? two? packages which broke. But I don't
know what horrors are in spec either.

Filip, is this a regression? Can you try reduce it please?

Reply via email to