https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117251
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is it possible to define a fused and/xor+xor alternative that's split after RA,
slightly pessimized to prefer the altivec alternative, to allow the XXL
registers to be used? Possibly those could also be made only formed by
late_combine after reload?
