https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117222
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > > [...] > > I'm very surprised by this as I was under the impression the prange stuff > > was an initial stub (new class of range) rather than with anything > > especially wired with it yet -- I must have misread something. > > > > (I should say: I thought it was a clone of irange to start with, with > adaptations planned, rather than - as it really is - already a set of some > initial diff. impls.) It is suppose to just be an irange clone ATM, as far as I know. With all range-op operations now going thru dispatch to prange implementations, its possible there is a missing operation or slightly different interaction somewhere. I'll have a look
