https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117168
--- Comment #4 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > > Reproduced. Reverting my r15-4373-gb388f65abc71c9 seems to help. I'll spend > > time on it today and see how I get on. If I hit a dead-end, I'll revert that > > for now. > > Could that be simply a missed case of using LRA instead of Reload on Solaris? This is what I'm wondering -- if we were somehow using reload all this time on Solaris.
