[Bug target/116571] [15 Regression] GCN vs. "lower SLP load permutation to interleaving"

[tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116571

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED

--- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> I've adjusted testcases - can you update the current state?

Thanks, we're largely good again!

Remaining is:

    PASS: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c (test for excess errors)
    PASS: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c execution test
    PASS: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
    [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1

..., which should be quick to resolve per
<https://inbox.sourceware.org/87bk01qx01....@euler.schwinge.ddns.net> "Re:
[PATCH 3/3] Handle non-grouped stores as single-lane SLP".

And, we've got the new PR116955 "[15 Regression] GCN '-march=gfx1100':
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.dg/vect/pr81740-2.c execution test".