https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116826
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Note PR 86710 lists the opposite (except without being a CST for the > division). > > Just like PR 86710, this applies for log, log10 and log2 too (and the type > variants too). Thanks for the reference. Yeah, splitting up one log call to two log calls is not a good idea for variable arguments, but when we can calculate the log (CST) at compile-time it should be a win.
