https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116783
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |14.3 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So to me, it looks more like memory_modified_in_insn_p is called with no context of mem so it does not know that `x1-184` (at insn 92) will overlap with the insn that stores to x1 (insn 106).