https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116772
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It is this pattern:
a != 0 ? a * b : 0 -> a * b
as we don't check if b could trap.
match and generic and cond_expr don't always get along it seems.
