https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116499
--- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov <boris at kolpackov dot net> --- > Note BMI is used as a x86_64 target instruction set Sure, BMI is an overloaded acronym (most people will probably think of the Body Mass Index). However, the rest of the C++ ecosystem seems to have (sometimes grudgingly) settled on BMI (even Microsoft folks use this term when they don't refer specifically to their IFC format). So the question is whether it's worthwhile for GCC to go against the grain here.
