https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116142
--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> To make it used by the reduction you'd need to have a dot_product covering
> the accumulation as well.
I can add that, but what if we slightly alter it to something like
short x[8], y[8];
int dot() {
int ret = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++)
ret ^= x[i] * y[i];
return ret;
}
? It's no longer a dot product but shouldn't vec_widen_smult_{even,odd}_v8hi
be used anyway?