https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Edwin Lu <ewlu at rivosinc dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #10 from Edwin Lu <ewlu at rivosinc dot com> ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #9)
> In some of my test runs (have not yet been able to deduce any pattern), I'm
> seeing this new test case FAIL its execution test:
>
> At line 33 of file
> [...]/source-gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr105361.f90 (unit = 10, file =
> 'fort.10')
> Fortran runtime error: Bad real number in item 2 of list input
>
> Error termination. Backtrace:
> #0 0xf7f114e1 in read_real
> at [...]/source-gcc/libgfortran/io/list_read.c:2080
> #1 0xf7f12a87 in list_formatted_read_scalar
> at [...]/source-gcc/libgfortran/io/list_read.c:2236
> #2 0xf7f182bd in wrap_scalar_transfer
> at [...]/source-gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:2591
> #3 0x8049486 in ???
> #4 0x8049695 in ???
> #5 0xf7996ed4 in ???
> #6 0x8049155 in ???
> #7 0xffffffff in ???
>
> There also appear to be similar "twinkling" PASS <-> FAIL reports in
> <gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org> posts.
I also see this appear to be flakey on riscv targets as well, albeit with a
longer and more unreadable backtrace
At line 33 of file
/disk-1/github/patrick-postcommit-3/_work/gcc-postcommit-ci/gcc-postcommit-ci/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr105361.f90
(unit = 10, file = 'fort.10')
Fortran runtime error: Bad real number in item 2 of list input
Error termination. Backtrace:
#0 0x2b2eebe9 in ???
#1 0x2b2ef469 in ???
#2 0x2b2efac9 in ???
#3 0x2b380bff in ???
#4 0x2b381c1b in ???
#5 0x2b3824ed in ???
#6 0x10a53 in ???
#7 0x10bc7 in ???
#8 0x2b4bc901 in ???
#9 0x2b4bc997 in ???
#10 0x107cb in ???
#11 0xffffffff in ???
Full list of our results can be found here:
https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/issues?q=FAIL%3A+gfortran.dg%2Fpr105361.f90
