https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115481
--- Comment #7 from dv at vollmann dot ch --- On 7/23/24 11:19, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115481 > > --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Oh it looks like 2.2.0 is *very* new (but 2.1.0 is quite old so Fedora is > quite > outdated). Debian stable also ships 2.0.0 ... I believe libstdc++ should at least build on top of 2.0.0. And I think the linker error that happens with my patch (<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/654980.html>) also should not happen with 2.0.0. I think not providing ::*f, ::*l, std::*f and std::*l for 2.0.0 and not providing ::*l and std::*l for 2.1.0 is ok. Detlef
