https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115932
Bug ID: 115932
Summary: [15 Regression] performance regression after
r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: cris-elf
With r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593 there was a change in test-suite results for
cris-elf that prompted me to run the coremark benchmark test before/after this
commit with my usual "-O2 -march=v10" options. See commit
r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593 where I goofed and incorrectly write that there were
no changes in results for coremark.
However, there *is* a performance regression, from 5179918 to 5181696 cycles
i.e. 0.034%. This PR is intended to keep track of similar results for other
targets and perhaps a tweak amending r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593.
