https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED |NEW --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Let's reopen this for the moving of the invariant out of the loop. Though this code could be improved further because of PR 61338; there might be a better testcase out there for the invariant case; though I can't find it right now.