https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115713
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #0)
> As Peter found in the PR115688, there isn't a warning for:
>
> long __attribute__ ((target ("no-altivec,vsx")))
> foo (void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> It's expected to see warning like:
>
> warning: ‘-mvsx’ and ‘-mno-altivec’ are incompatible
I think Segher and I mentioned in the other bug, that conflicting options like
this should be an error, rather than a warning.
