https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97687
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 58523 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58523&action=edit WIP patch to try to print all notes for an error with -Wfatal-errors Am attaching an experimental patch for this that keeps the compiler around on -Wfatal-errors if there's an active diagnostic_group until after the diagnostic_group ends, or a non-note follows. Unfinished, as it would need: - ChangeLog - docs update - test cases (for text, sarif and json output); possibly via a test plugin to synthesize the case of a followup error within the same diagnostic_group But the main thing is, are we comfortable not bailing out immediately on the error in -Wfatal-errors? There could be non-trivial work being done in the scope of the auto_diagnostic_context. Perhaps something to discuss on mailing list.
