https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104395
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> It doesn't seem very helpful for GCC and Clang to accept enum class
> align_val_t in C++98 mode, but not accept alignof in system headers.
It would only need to be accepted when -faligned-new / -faligned-allocation is
active, which is already requesting a non-standard extension to C++98.
