https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115640
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|GCN: FAIL: |[15 Regression] GCN: FAIL:
|gfortran.dg/vect/pr115528.f |gfortran.dg/vect/pr115528.f
| -O execution test | -O execution test
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=114107
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Turns out, this is a regression after all: before commit
r15-1238-g1fe55a1794863b5ad9eeca5062782834716016b2 "tree-optimization/114107 -
avoid peeling for gaps in more cases", this test case
'gfortran.dg/vect/pr115528.f' (which, of course, wasn't in-tree back then) does
PASS its execution test for GCN target (tested '-march=gfx908').
