https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115565
Roger Sayle <roger at nextmovesoftware dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2024-06-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |roger at nextmovesoftware dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle <roger at nextmovesoftware dot com> --- Doh! I hadn't noticed (twenty years ago) that -1 was used to represent an invalid quantity number in CSE's comparison_qty field. There was no mention of this in my post or patch. Using INT_MIN looks like a reasonable (good) fix. Presumably backends that constrain values in hard register zero (before reload) are rare, which is why no-one has noticed/been affected by this. Thanks for the fix, and my apologies for the inconvenience.