https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115545
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[15 regression] |[15 regression]
|missing/excess errors after |missing/excess errors after
|r15-1395-g01044471ea39f9 |r15-1394
CC|rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org |muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115109.c (test for excess errors)
Was definitely introduced by the patch before you mentioned:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=c9b96a68860bfdee49d40b4a844af7c5ef69cd12
They fail with -m32 just like x86_64 too:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/654984.html
