https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111475
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> writes: > --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Thanks. I've been working on this on cfarm216; I have a messy set of patches > with this improvement to g++.sum with analyzer.exp so far: > > # of expected passes 11395 -> 12015 > # of unexpected failures 684 -> 64 > # of unexpected successes 4 -> 0 > # of expected failures 443 -> 447 > # of unsupported tests 50 > > However I'm don't have access to my regular workstation/testing box until late > tomorrow, so I'm holding off on posting until I've cleaned them up and put > them > through my usual testing regime. That's excellent news, thanks for the update.
