https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #10) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9) > > (In reply to anlauf from comment #8) > > > I get the same behavior at r13-8559 as 14-mainline. There seems to be > > > another commit that fixed it independently. > > > > > > Removing 13-branch from the regression list. > > > > Mark as fixed or backport fixes? > > Either I did something wrong, or the bug reappeared on 13-branch... > > Anyway, I tried backporting Andre's patch to 13- and 12-branch. > Works fine and regtests fine. > > How to proceed? > > I can push those changes, so that we are finally done with this PR. Hi Harald, It would be splendid if you would backport the patch. In the last week or so, I have built up quite a list of backports to do, which I will attend to over the weekend. We are down from 105 regressions on 26th March to 94 now, of which 13 are now fixed on mainline. Since there are still some P1 regressions, I have been prowling around looking for more low hanging edibles while there is still time. Regards Paul
