https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23872
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> With the example in PR 86698 with the patches I will be posting, gcc now
> does:
> ```
> ;; Function f (null)
> ;; enabled by -tree-original
>
>
> {
> int x = z++ , y;
>
> DECL_EXPR<int x>;
> return x;
> }
>
> ```
>
> I am still deciding if we want to print out the DECL_INIT for the DECL_EXPR
> or not. But this seems like a reasonible output so far.
Oh there is still some confusion around the printing of the DECL_INIT for the
decl. Let me fix that ...
