https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106987
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5)
> Hi Harald,
>
> I am pinning this one on you since it needs backporting to 13-branch, at
> least. It also keeps the audit trail clean.
Hi Paul,
this one is at the top of my backport list.
It depends on backporting r14-8902 (mine), and has weak conflict if
r14-1629 (yours) is not backported, as testcase gfortran.dg/pr99350.f90
was introduced in that commit.
I could amend backporting the fix for the current PR as well as r14-8902
to 13-branch by removing the changes to pr99350.f90 from the backport.
That is likely the most simple solution, as backporting r14-1629 might
introduce regressions.
Nevertheless, the current fixes can only be backported to 13-branch,
as some of the infrastructure changes for better error recovery after
arithmetic errors and when array ctors are involved are to risky to
backport to 12-branch.
What do you think?
