https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114547

--- Comment #2 from gooncreeper <goon.pri.low at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am not sure this is always better ...

sets and setns are 1 uop, just like any other setcc
why wouldn't it be better?

Reply via email to