https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487

--- Comment #29 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #28)
> The bug is about the issue of lacking diagnostics, it should be fine to make
> note of various approaches to remedy the problem in one bug report.
> 

OK, well, in this case, I'd like to make this the bug report for MSan support
in general, too, then; it's documented here:
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/MemorySanitizer

(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #19)
> > Martin, I suppose the sanitizer bits can be tracked as enhancement and not
> > regression. It is a firefox bug so I suppose we can declare this a
> > non-regression.
> 
> Sure, maybe I would return to support of MSAN in GCC 7.

Maybe for GCC 14 now?
  • [Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnin... egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to